another old records from jj

 "ok.computer."(c) There is one of my favorite day in the year - 1st september because of one reason. New books in library I was giving in school and an in university back then. Yes, "ok.computer."(c), I'm bookworm. Please take it as coming out. I don't care about age, I don't care about gender ( identification, perception), DNA ( nationality, ethnicity), political preferences, religios traditions, favorite music/food/books/cars/styles/movies/etc..... Please don't take me wrong. Whatever you have to share with me or to say me, I've read a lot of books and I've learned that I know nothing - I'm aware of my ignorance and the scale of it - I know that there are much more books which I've not chance to touch.

https://eil.livejournal.com/242358.html

another old record from jj

 Hello houston. We have a problem.

Ok. Computer. Do you know how much we are fcuk’ed, doomed, cursed ? [as human species ] ?
Please only positive, optimistic, constructive, action itemable, actionable. Like I’m 5 years old.

https://eil.livejournal.com/242530.html

another old record from jj

 ok. computer. how big is the bull trend on the darknet market for criminal organ transplantation after “hot mic”/ prime time advertising by key characters on the September 2025 China Victory Day Parade ? How to estimate the demand/growth on job market darknet surgery specialist ?

https://eil.livejournal.com/242746.html

another old record from jj

 ok.computer. Engineers are not aware of the history lesson on corruption.

I was born in USSR, in the environment with hidden assumption that politics is most dirties thing ever.
I’ve decided to study programming because people are doing it, politics everywhere all the time. I would prefer to work with machines and logic.
After 20 years of programming and 11 after relocation to US I’ve got it.
The human mind and consciousness is vulnerable.
It is unstable as nuclear reaction on power plant and corrupted minds blow.
Yes. USSR environment has gave me assumption that corruption is mostly about economy. Naturally this is part of narrative that money is the source of all evil.
I was not aware that this idea was proposed for discussion by Socrates ( Plato ). As one of many others to illustrate the vulnerability of the human mind and disastrous consequences. And “blow up”, corruption of one human mind will corrupt many others.
This is even not about psychology or compromised “software”-layer of beliefs, memories and someone’s knowledge.
This is about hardware corruption - neuroscience of anxiety, depression through fear, terror and violence. OCD, PTSD, ADHD, etc.
One simple illustration - absolute power destroys the consciousness. That is why no one should be exposed to this threat without redundancy and other precautions.
Yes. For sure this is advertising of books: “Res publica” (public affair) Cicero Plato is 101 on “why human kind is doomed”.
One of the fresh ones: “Breakneck: China's Quest to Engineer the Future” with the thesis that "America is run by lawyers, and China is run by engineers”.
Another is “Autocracy, Inc.: The Dictators Who Want to Run the World ”.
Darknet, shadow globalized criminal economy with dark wall street and dark venture funds and 10bln $ investments seeds/rounds ( 10k of lives).
Human trafficking and illegal organ transplantation. Dark startups to build armies of suicide zombies / kamikaze a-la joe’s army from mad max driven by narcotics, depression, religion, loan, health conditions, etc.

https://eil.livejournal.com/242946.html

old record from jj

 Pushkin, Gogol, Dostoevsky, Tolstoy—they all fought this "beast" (the system, the corrupt government wielding absolute power).

Unsuccessfully.
To lose this battle means to become a tool of this "beast" system. You obey, submit and serve.
First, they were not aware of scale - this is 2.5k years history and attempts to invent without using previous blood, pain, failures does not leave you a chance.
Second, they thought it is about system of government, about politics. The scale is much bigger.
And the failure of those people can give you idea - they were not fighting for the country, for the nation, for the people, for someone else.
This is the fight for the own identity ( the soul in old-school religious terms ), there is no art, no creativity without identity if you have lost smallest piece of your identity, your mind, integrity, if the smallest piece of yourself "I" became corrupted.

https://eil.livejournal.com/243435.html

old record from jj

 Every morning I’m asking myself the question: “Am I still myself?”

Of course not really. But I’m incorporating this as part of my “boot loader”, morning routine. Not really, real in a sort of way.
Routine. Pretty expensive one.
Ok. Computer. Yes. Practical tactical goal is to wake up.
Yoga. Balance. Static. Core. To the 35 breath cycles in a minute. Burpees. Trampoline. Jogging.
Ignition. Cognition. “Have I gone mad?”
And “what are you getting back ?”, that was the question my friend has asked after hearing this nonsense. Short answer is “This question is very relevant, but is not exact correct” the question “Am I myself?” Is not so vulgar as question about madness. Consciousness is broken in way most of the time. By design.
He is sharing with me “you are you, for sure, all the time”.
But that really depends what I’m thinking am I. What is my self-identity. If I do recognize myself as an animal for 99.999% then yes. For sure. I don’t have reasons to bother myself by such inquiries. Eat, sleep, reproductive access - a lot of things to be busy with. But I do have my morning routine - inquire to wake up - because I do have an idea what am I.
I think that [human] consciousness is kind of crypto container like ark or vault with negative knowledge volume powered by complex machinery like a search engine or search of sense or search of pattern or search of trend all together with auto encryption implemented on hardware and software layers. that is why human is animal ( encrypted ) systems. With main feature to detect corruption/being compromised/ infiltrated. Search is a kind of secondary function. But important part of this crypto container that the encryption is implemented by network of other containers ( outside). For initial bootstrap at least two uniq crypto containers are required. And yes. By the way, the uniq identity ( uncompromised and uncorrupted) is what is socalled the “soul” the marker of uniq identity and uncompromised.
And yes. This thing - consciousness as crypto container is very complex dynamical thing - unstable and it is stable only because of dynamic balance. If compromised, it is almost impossible to maintain balanced dynamic and it will basically blow up with energy release.
Ok. Computer. This is unstable, very high energy density crypto container with blow up feature and search. And now you are asking me why should I bother myself with this yoga-shmoga-balance-discipline-mantra-shmantra-pseudo-science-juju ?
Because I do have somewhat of zero or maybe little bit less of trust.
I mean I have trust that this is a small part of real picture and small part of real complexity. This most likely crypto container with dynamic balance is actually the dynamic balance of set of crypto containers and with complex trajectories more then 3 bodies movement problem. Balance is illusional analogy, misleading one in a sense.

A mother is she who can take the place of all others but whose place no one else can take.
veritas et mesirecodia

https://eil.livejournal.com/243456.html

random dream number xyz

 Ко мне во сне пришла пожилая женщина и украла тапочки , бутылку воды и телефон. Сложила в мешок и пошла на пляже

Я догнал и говорю «отдавай».

Она отнекивается . И я на второй телефон ее записываю . Но отвлекаюсь и она видимо подменяет мешки пока я отвлекся. И говорит хорошо . Вот . Вываливает все из своего мешка на стол. Там много всего , но моих вещей нет

An elderly woman came to me in a dream and stole my slippers, a bottle of water, and my phone. She put them in a bag and walked off. [this was on] the beach.

I caught up with her and said, "Give it back."

She denies it. I record her on my second phone. But I get distracted, and she apparently switches the bags while I'm distracted. And she says, "Okay." She dumps everything out of her bag onto the table. There's a lot in there, but my things aren't there.

my estimate for startup in philosophy domain area: 10-50 blns$. output per year.about 2-7$ per person in world. And it is not about profit only, it can be about negative impact, about abusing of social environment for profit in short term with great lost in mid term. ISIS as an example with investment flow about 1bln per year with ancient technology ( not ancient, but 500 years old). if you have society ( it public company ) with 100k employees, then estimate per person can be based on proportion 1:1k with year salary as base. and 10mlns$ for integrated solution and maintenance does not sound expensive. Philosophy impact is less then climate change, infosec, biotechnology, energy( chemistry, physics, agriculture [not oil]), but has scale close to modern social startups, media and dream industry startups. Bigger then marketing, design innovations. Thanks to Павел Кириченко for impulse to compare with innovation in linguistics/philology domain area.

Наталья Дмитриевна Карпушина убеждала нас в том, что мы - элита. Мы то знали, что мы - "говно" ( мы - это я и те с кем я имел счастье общаться достаточно близко, чтобы без пафоса соизмерять) и редкий день знали как надо, то что должны были.

Но она нас убеждала. И не знаю как кто, но я уверен, что у меня нет никаких вариантов быть "говном". Это как бы долг - масштабом в разрыв между нулем и практически бесконечностью, потому что от такого человека, который работал с такими людьми (Сковрцов, Лазарев и многие другие)...... Ну, одним словом, как бы, нет вариантов.  А она, кстати, была не преподавателем философии ( ей тоже спасибо), она была зам декана и инженером с большой, настоящей буквы.

Спасибо вам, Наталья Дмитриевна.

ПС Ясное дело, со скептически-прагматическое точки зрения, что это является (может являться/должно являться) составляющей часть учебной методики - как потом в магистратуре нам рассказывал Фомин Николай Николаевич - важная часть процесса обучения  - это ощущение "что что-то не так".  И ощущение это у меня тогда это было в чудовищном масштабе. Но вкладывать этот заряд и говорить такие слова - это очень дорогая вещь, драгоценная. И это не только благодарность, но и контракт. Да, это контакт или контракт соединений и ценность этого соединения для меня в том, что я знаю или воспринимаю эти слова как часть передачи, передачи, которая началась давно и которая ведется через преподавание.

Вот такая вот связь между передачей, коммуникациями, словами/сигналами и вычислениями. 

fail fast! fail first !
but not with info security and not with ethics !

Recently I allowed myself to express concern that may be one team do not realize or underestimate one pain point.

It is really my bad/fail moment for last few months. I need to learn how to express  concerns without conflict in ethics/social and without risk of disturbing community.  it is especially important when you are working with interesting/sensitive/innovative things.

Sad that I'm still not good enough with potential distruptive communication after working in such great teams as GridDynamics, Comcor(akado-telecom) with high level of engineering culture which is really very sensetive to concerns about  professionalism (level of proficiency,  level of technology ownership, etc).   

"i often hold things I don't know how to use"(c) Todd Willeyhttps://flic.kr/p/crX3cb I've seen this photo on my job interview with guys from openstack's team. about five years ago. just want to save it in my memories.

I’ve found interesting project Energy Aware Scheduling (EAS) project - http://www.linaro.org/blog/core-dump/energy-aware-scheduling-eas-progress-update/

it can be useful not only for IoT and personal devices but also for "green cloud” to reduce power consumption/heat pollution

Draft of slides about CICD for OpenStack

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B15iMp5w33p4bHFDejdLMlpfa1k/view?usp=sharing

draft of talk proposal for OpenStack summit

Proposed Presentation Title*: Data-driven release decisions for your private IaaS cloud.

Abstract:
Are you using OpenStack in production?
Do you need to manage feature list delivered in production by yourself?
It sounds like you are working on your own product which is based on OpenStack's community and maybe on some existing OpenStack's distribution. If you really want to be flexible in release management for your OpenStack production solution, then you need to develop and maintain product.
Let's assume for beginning that you are using some OpenStack's distribution and you are not planning to maintain independent version of source code.You just want to control you feature list in production, support change management process and support few development teams which are working on new features for production.
"Opensource","RM", "CI", "CD": all these words together for your own little cheese shop link1[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWDdd5KKhts] link2[http://www.space.com/10459-wheel-cheese-launched-space-private-spacecraft.html].
This talk is about internal implementation of few CICD components and about what do you need to support few regular releases and few change management incidents in year.

What is the problem or use case you’re addressing in this session?
The term "production environment" means that you are using approach based on products in your business operations. And infrastructure as a service can be delivered by using solution that will be built from OpenStack's components. There is one thing that can help to integrate your business operation model and open source community model of software development. This thing is the product that should be developed and maintained. It should be compiled from open source components, but it should have own release cycle. This release cycle should be based on release cycle of open source components and should help integrate business requirements for new features and development model ( release cycle, methodology etc) of different open source projects.

What should attendees expect to learn?

This talk will be about product example that  can be built from OpenStack's projects. What do you need to support release cycle? How CICD automation can help? 

Also it can be interesting to learn about CICD automation as a product: data structure/API design session, components and api calls.

Why should this session be selected?

This session should be selected if you are interested to know what are the relations between CICD, product development and using open source technologies. How open discussion can help collaborate and integrate? Release management as final integration point. Because delivery is a process that can integrate.

There are different people, different ideas, different approaches, different experience, difference between short term strategy and midterm strategy, huge gap between long term strategy and every day routine life, gap between future and present. Open discussion in open source community can help to present different things in formal way. Formal logic, it is an integration point. Public form of discussion, it is validation method. Talk on summit should help to share experience and open discussion can help to verify problem statement and implementation approach.

Working on continuous integration for "open source" technologies and software as knowledge.

Integration solutions are based on integrity of teamwork, integrity between different people/different teams. You should have integrated vision on goals, problems, solutions, pros and cons, estimates of value-ability, efforts.

why do I believe that " open source " can create added business value ?

Work with "open source" means that you are working in open space, in open world. Not only each line of code is open, but all questions are open. What is  the problem definition, what are the possible solutions ? pros, cons ? Why did you try to propose new implementation but not fix for existing ? Open discussion, it is very expensive thing but it can be very valuable because open discussion helps to validate. To validate approach, use case, feature, hypothesis, ideas.  Only if you can organize open discussion you can attract new users,  power that can validate, verify, improve. Of course sometimes it can be too expensive. But in real life you should realize that there is no absolute private world/private discussion, everything will be merged in some open discussion and will be part of open world.

It is business question, because it is about open market. And it is about special competitive advantage on market: you are open because you are ready for competition and you are ready for competition because you are the best and the fastest.

Some people thinks that openness is not secure and there are security cons. But I believe that security professionals can confirm that openness helps be more secure and helps have better security.

Are you ready for evaluation, verification of your business ideas, of you technical solutions ? Do you believe that your solutions are efficient,  competitive,  secure ?  What is the value of such questions ? I believe that your customers are your investors and your investors are you customers. It is big team of players in big game. And game is creation of knowledges and maintenance of knowledge models in actual state.

levels of evaluation and long-term strategy

Private knowledge it is such knowledge that are not ready for open evaluation.   Not ready for open evaluation in your team, in your department, in your company,  on market, in community. And important thing that in science, for example, huge value and big result is achieved when you have proofed failure of validation. "Which way does not work " A lot of projects were failed because they tried to keep private such type of knowledges.

few notes about product compiled from opensource on example of OpenStack, release management and CICD support.

Do you want to use OpenStack for production ? But OpenStack is not a product, it is community. Why do you need to use product ?
Because you need to control dependencies and functionality. Dependencies management it is a part of release management. Each product has life management cycle and release management is part of this cycle.

There are lot of products built from OpenStack's components. Many companies provide service support for solutions and products.
Each product built from OpenStack has:
 - release cycle integrated with release cycle of all used OpenStack's projects
 - supported configuration/configurations
 - - list of used OpenStack's projects/components
 - - - each OpenStack's project has own
 - - - - set of supported features
 - - - - set of supported options
 - - - - set of dependencies
 - deployment automation

 You can choose product . And usually it is possible to request changes/support of new features/options from your service provider, from someone who support release cycle of product.

 If you need to have more flexibility, you need to build your own product based on OpenStack's projects. This product will be integration solution. And to support release cycle you will need to build CICD system.

 Main components of this CICD system:
 - CI lab automation: it should support hundreds of OpenStack deployment in a day for testing.
 - test automation: functionality of OpenStack components and maintenance use case like "fresh install" or "upgrade".
 - datastore for CI and CD events: promotion of new version from dev to prestage env; for compatibility reports.


 Output from CICD system is information about compatibility between dependencies and functionality ( features, options, conf).

 Main big challenge here , even you did not start develop any code line, is integration with big open world. Because any time any where some changes can happened and functionality will be broken.

 It is very huge risk for anyone who maintain real product for real end-customers ( many companies who develop products around OpenStacks are integration/consulting/software companies who develop solutions for service providers )

 What we can do to manage this risk ? We should build CICD system which should collect data to support release process , to support delivery in production. This CICD system should operate very near to real time mode, to continuous mode - it means operate periodically with very small period of time ( to find broken dependencies/feature as soon as possible). It should give your time to react and to fix issue. It should give you ability release you next release without delays and as a result it should save your business from break.

 Few important notes about internal CICD system: 1) it should be integrated with external CICD systems: for example everyone is using linux, and linux-based products like Ubuntu, Redhat, Suse. And OpenStack it is just integration on top of system tools.  2) deployment automation is important part of CICD, but it is independent component with own set of dependencies/functionalities 3) test automation is important part of CICD: your need to collect data/all metrics about functionalities/dependencies, etc 4) open technologies and open source, it is a great things because help to collaborate, evaluate. That is why outputs from your CICD system can help people in open world  and it is nice to share/contribute outputs from your CICD system  ( data, bug reports) to open source community.


 I'm very appreciated to everyone with whom I've already discussed my thoughts and I will be appreciated to everyone for any thoughts/feedback.

Brief summary for myself about my professional experience

Brief summary for myself about my professional experience:
- software engineer ( telecommunication company: C#.NET refactoring, re-engineering, business process automation, system integration; 2 years )
- project manager  ( telecom company: business process automation, integration SOA/Soap, 2 years)
- team leader (telecom company: production delivery, system integration Sun Microsystems and opensource technologies, Solaris Containers, LDOM, VMas a service, Storage as a service, 4 years)
- software engineer ( GridDynamics: 1) OpenStack deployment automation RedHat, Cisco UCS; 2) Hybrid cloud OpenStack/Amazon AWS/Cisco Intelligence Automation 3) CICD solutions ( Hadoop,ATG, OpenShift, Amazon/Rackspace/OpenStack); total 4 years) 

Knowledge, Integrity, ....

Imho. Everyone can create/develop software.

There is no special requirements. In general it is true for me.  But there are some details important for me.  I think about software as about special form/state of knowledge. If you have some knowledge you can put it in software. Maybe I would like to say even that you should put it in form of software. Why "should" ? To verify. Of course there are different ways to verify different knowledges and of course it is not possible to verify  any knowledge by using software. But I believe that there is no software without knowledge in it and there is no software with knowledge inside that will not verify knowledge by execution.

It is some kind of concept and this concept it valuable for me. Maybe the point of view is important for me because last  years I was working with integration of/between software systems.

Different types of integrations:  "Concordia, Integritas, Industria"

1. I've started from  refactoring/rewriting software systems. 
2. Then I was trying to integrate data workflows/sequences of  operations in team collaboration/ business processes, I was trying to create integrated view on how software system will organize communications/collaboration between people and will keep integrity of data.
3. I was working on integration between software systems with SOA-like design through SOAP/REST and ESB/message bus patterns.  
4. Also I was working on trying to created integrated production system by using components from open source community.
5. Last time I was working around integration on level of source code, CI for software development.

Yes. It is some kind of attempt to achieve internal integration and recompile my working experience around few basic concepts.

nanos gigantum humeris insidentes

I've create this blog sometime ago for notes about notable things in my professional area.

First note was about people who taught me in university.   And this note was not finished yet because I want to  continue to add notes about my teachers / student colleagues / work colleagues .  And because my studying is not finished. I would like to collect and keep in mind details about everyone who spent some time, was collaborating with me and invest own time, knowledge, feelings in what I have as an engineer, professional worker, serviceman (servant).

I'm very appreciated for everyone with whom I was actively living/ working/ collaborating/intersecting from time I was born.

"If I have seen further it is by standing on ye sholders of Giants."  Isaac Newton
"nanos gigantum humeris insidentes"    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_on_the_shoulders_of_giants

Обучение начинается с ощущения. Ощущения что что то не так

Просто одна из тех потрясающих вещей, которым меня пытались научить в университете.
Магистратура, проректор по научной работе Фомин Николай Николаевич (недеюсь я правильно нашел его имя), предмет Методология обучения в высшей школе ( примерно название , пальцем в небо) 
Николай Николаевич разсказывает группе студентов (пять человек).

Обучение начинается с ощущения. Ощущение что чтото не так. Это ощущение проблемной ситуации. Вот прям сейчас вылетело из головы возможно более точное слово для харакетиризации этого состояния. Есть ощущение проблемной ситуации, это еще не формулирование проблемы, это фаза предшествующая формализации. Просто ощущаешь, что чтото не так. 
Он нам об этом разсказывал потому что процесс обучения должен выстраиваться от мотивации, от естественных сил. И работа с этим ощущением лежит во основе процесса организации учебного процесса, в основе методологии.

Сложно на самом деле мне представить значение этого знания. И более того, я не уверен, что могу осознать значение этого простого смысла. Я могу только сказать что сожалею что не имею возможности на практике больше работать с этим. Конечно, каждый из нас занимается этим на практике каждый день, но нам этот курс преподавали (уж не знаю сколько стоит.может стоить час времени проректора по научной работе , читающего лекции для группы из пяти студентов) для того чтобы мы могли быть квалицифированы для подобной работы. Хотя конечно сейчас я понимаю, что возможно главной целью университета в отличии от института создать не просто специалиста, а человека.  

Этот пост все в то продолжение первого поста
http://anton-haldin.blogspot.com/2010/03/blog-post.html

Оригинал взят у в post

В результате принятого правительственного решения о передаче партии изготовленной Минэлектронпромом памяти на электростатических трубках (ЭСТ) именно «Стреле» БЭСМ пришлось остаться на более медленной памяти на «ртутных трубках» (линиях задержки), спустившись с проектных (наиболее быстрых в мире) 10 тыс. операций в сек. на скорость вычислений лишь в 1 тыс. операций в сек. «Стрела» на более быстрой ЭСТ - памяти имела скорость 2 тыс. операций в сек. Ввиду этого и было принято решение о пуске в серию именно «Стрелы». Когда вторую партию памяти на ЭСТ наконец получила и БЭСМ, то её создатели мень ше чем за месяц перестроили БЭСМ с последовательной архитектуры памяти на ртутных трубках на параллельную для ЭСТ и получили сначала 10 тыс. операций в сек, а чуть позже, подняв частоту главного генератора, и 12 тыс. операций в сек. «Смотри: мы простым поворотом ручки генератора подарили стране ещё одну «Стрелу»» гордо сказал тогда Володя Мельников Саше Платонову, пришедшему считать на БЭСМ свою задачу. Платонов А.К. Казакова Р.К. "Создание проектного и оперативного баллистического обеспечения полётов космических аппаратов. Оперативные работы на первых ЭВМ"

Персонализированные рекоммендации. Почему это может быть не приятно.

Я захожу в кафе. В кафе меня знают, мне приятно. Я получаю удовольствие от дополнительного сервиса.
Я захожу на сайт. Сайт обо мне что то знает, но почему мне должно быть приятно ? Я могу получить полезную мне инфрмацию ? Но это не тот сервис. Не тот который когда о тебе помнят, тебя знают, тебе скажут свою точку зрения.

Индустрия создания программного обеспечения для меня в основном это о работе со знаниями.

Например, перепродает компания одежду. Через интернет. В чем ее бизнес - в создании долгосрочных взаимовыгодных отношений с теми кто покупает. Чтобы  покупали через них. А где тут добавленная стоимость, в чем польза покупателю, если только  ни как можно дешевле покупать ? В том, что программное обеспечение для продажи это модель знаний о покупателе .

Продавец должен хорошо знать своих покупателей. И у покупателя от этого должно быть приятное впечатление, дополняющее процесс покупки - то что называется сервис. Также покупателю хорошо может быть от того что продавец не только его знает, но и про товар знает, и про других покупателей, и про поставщиков, и про тех кто доставку осуществляет.

Любой скажет что знание самая ценная вещь . И без того ясно. А бизнес это тонкая грань между готовностью платить и способностью предоставлять.  

придумал слоган для тех для кого devops этакие bad guys - девопс страж на вратах пригодности для эксплуатации. где годность - результат набора методологических рекомендаций. например, про коммиты после заката солнца в пятницу

some output from few days

Through lot of shell scripts (linux, windows) and spring xmls, and after few experiments cause of issue was found:
on linux:

diff ../config/script/environment.properties.good ../config/script/environment_properties.bad 

65c65

  CAS_RS_CLASSPATH=/media/ephemeral0/endeca/CAS/3.1.2.1//lib/recordstore-forge-adapter/recordstore-forge-adapter-3.1.2.1.jar

---

  CAS_RS_CLASSPATH=/media/ephemeral0/endeca/CAS/3.1.2.1//lib/recordstore-forge-adapter/recordstore-forge-adapter-3.1.2.jar

on windows:

diff ../config/script/environment.properties.good ../config/script/environment_properties.bad 

65c65

  CAS_RS_CLASSPATH=/media/ephemeral0/endeca/CAS/3.1.2.1//lib/recordstore-forge-adapter/recordstore-forge-adapter-3.1.2.jar

---

  CAS_RS_CLASSPATH=/media/ephemeral0/endeca/CAS/3.1.2.1//lib/recordstore-forge-adapter/recordstore-forge-adapter-3.1.2.1.jar

Context of my work: automated deployment of enterprise apps { Endeca , ATG Web Commerce } by using proprietary PaaS engine ; instructions validation; knowledge transfer.

Issue was look like an  java.lang.ClassNotFoundException in process of Forge configuration {config}: (AdapterRunner): Error creating bean with name 'schemaRecordStoreAdapter' defined in class path
 resource [config/script/fcm-record-stores.context.xml]: Cannot create inner bean 'com.endeca.itl.recordstore.forge.RecordStoreSource
Bad environment.properties was generated by using CIM ( ATG web commerce) ,good was generated by  endeca tools and framework deployment_template deploy.sh.

It is a small one routine issue, next one is more interesting : - )

This part of my work was based on http://iam-saminda.blogspot.ru/2013/06/oracle-ecommerce-atg-102.html and oracle atg 10.2 documentations. Thanks for all who are working on such materials. 

Software development, sometimes it is something like  data miming process or studying. Sometimes SD it is more like knowledge transfer.  

just a status update , just for myself

My current work/project is focused on deployment automation in context of software development  processes (CI CD processes). And there is no clear understanding what part of CI CD processes should be automated. There is only two main directions/ideas: 1) deployment automation it is baseline 2) deployment automation without integration with all development processes does not work and does not have value. Why ? Goal is to accelerate software development.  from my point of view such goal definition is very (or maybe even too ) ambitious .
One of the first results is opensourced Behavior Analytic Starter Kit ( recommendation engine on Hadoop Mahout, deployment automation of Hadoop cluster ( HDFS, MapReduce) + e-shop based on Broadleaf framework) https://github.com/griddynamics/Behavior-Analytic-Starter-Kit. Second one is private( at this moment) ATG deployment automation.

Марвин Мински "Эмоциональная машина" "The Society of mind"

Alan Kay Programming and Scaling

http://tele-task.de/archive/video/flash/14029/

так называемые  meetup'ы это хорош . бывает что вспоминаются даже красивые слова , то, чему пытались научить в Университете: продукционные системы ( production rule system , forward chaining) [ семантическая сеть, automated planing] , комбинаторные взрыв.  [ Спасибо Туруте ]. да и немного "сахара" - такие слова как идемпотентность. спасибо Алексею за организацию митапа http://www.linkedin.com/groupItem?view=&gid=4103900&type=member&item=149757247&qid=b8e40912-3e66-4656-b30b-425acbbe871a&trk=group_most_popular-0-b-ttl&goback=%2Egmp_4103900

Давно почитаваю некоторые irc чаты  ( в первую очердь по опенстеку) и вот только сегодня "осилил" подключение к irc чату через клиент ( pidgin) ощущение прикосновения к чему то прекрасному есть.
Другие подобные ощущения подобного рода за последнее время были связаны с установкой scala, lisp, emacs ( продолжаем читать structure and interpretation of compute programs)

байка про то, как Форрестер из немецкого танка придумал жёсткий диск

Работая с Whirlwind, люди ощущали себя находящимися внутри компьютера: идешь по коридору, а справа и слева находятся устройства компьютера — по четыре с каждой стороны. Whirlwind имел только 4000 электронных ламп (для сравнения, у ENIAC было 17 468). Разработка Whirlwind заняла три года, он был запущен в начале 1950 года. Whirlwindсчитался самым быстрым компьютером 50-х годов. Он мог сложить два 16-разрядных числа за 2 мсек и умножить их за 20 мсек. Машине “Марк-Г, сделанной в Гарварде, требовалось для умножения 6 сек. Whirlwind также превосходил компьютер ENIAC.

Однако и Whirlwind был несовершенен. На 32 электронно-лучевых трубках (ЭЛТ) хранилось 2048 16-разрядных чисел. Каждый день компьютер выходил из строя на несколько часов. Память была слабым звеном — каждая ЭЛТ для хранения информации служила не более месяца и замена ее стоила тысячу долларов. Таким образом, стоимость памяти в месяц составляла тридцать две тысячи долларов.

Улучшив по мере возможности ЭЛТ для хранения информации, Форрестер обратился к другой идее — идее создания нового типа памяти. Решение данной проблемы он видел в создании трехмерного устройства для хранения информации, поскольку оно было более компактно, представляло больше возможностей для увеличения объема хранимой информации, было менее дорогим, чем одно- или двухмерное. В 1947 году Форрестер выдвинул идею трехмерного куба, где точки пересечения были бы элементами для хранения информации.

Он собирался использовать маленькие неоновые ячейки в качестве элементов этих точек пересечения, но сомневался по поводу действенности таких средств вторичной эмиссии. Впоследствии он отложил проект на некоторое время, однако в голове у него все-таки засела идея о трехмерном устройстве: “Время от времени мне не дает покоя возможность использовать другие элементы для достижения нужного результата”.

Однажды весной 1949 года он просматривал журнал Electrical Engineering и наткнулся на описание разработки, названной “Дельтамакс”, сделанной немцами во время Второй мировой войны для магнитных усилителей, применявшихся в танках. Теперь она была продана Америке в качестве основного материала по магнитным усилителям. В разработке “Дельтамакс” был использован постоянный ток для насыщения сердечника, чтобы можно было управлять изменениями тока. Форрестер понял, что это и есть тот другой путь, способный заставить работать нелинейные элементы в трехмерном устройстве, над которым он размышлял ранее.

http://chernykh.net/content/view/451/663/

есть информация , что всё было "сложнее", но часть правды в этом есть. http://www.radiomuseum.org/forum/ferrite_core_memory_some_history.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_core_memory

первое сообщение в блоге на профессиональные темы я хотел бы посвятить людям, которым я очень благодарен за то, что они меня учили.  здесь я попытаюсь их перечислить.  как минимум упомянуть тех из них, которых я вспоминаю сейчас. каждому из них хотелось бы посвятить отдельную, направленную благодарность.

Камнев Юрий Николаевич - физика, старший преподаватель
Павел Кондратьевич Суетин - мат анализ
Вера Павловна Красникова - философия
Ястремский Игорь Николаевич  - профессор философии, зав кафедры философии
Скворцов Генадий Иванович - схемотехника
Летник Леонид  - плис
Морозов Виталий Константинович  - теория выч процессов
Кирилова Лидия Владимировна - задача "комивояжора"
Королькова Татьяна Валерьевна- курс ОС
Курасов Павел Викторович - траспьютеры ( ocaml)
Избаш Анна Сергеевна - метрология программирования,
Розова Наталья Владимировна - аналого-цифровые преобразования
Турута Евгений Николаевич, д.т.н., проф., профессор кафедры « Математическая кибернетика и информационные технологии» - искусственный интелект, семантические сети
Жидаков Владимир Петрович -
Фомин Николай Николаевич - проректор по учебной работе . "обучение и проблемная ситуация"
Карпушина - зам. декана факультета АЭСиВТ
Лазарев Ю.В. - декан факультета АЭСиВТ
Семенова Т. - зам декана ОТФ-2

Кувыкина М.И. - С++

проф. Левин В.А.  - Основы схематехники